My view about the Moderators here

[Peter Peeker]

What I have to say will probably provoke a response from Star Wars Fanboy, Inc.. It may label me "oleaginous" or even "logorrheic". I realize and accept that as a consequence of what I am about to say. However, I do hope that Star Wars Fanboy, Inc. will read everything I have to say before labeling me. To get immediately to the point, I am now in a position to define what I mean when I say that this is not the first time we've had trouble with barbaric hatemongers, and it certainly won't be the last. What I mean is that it says that it needs a little more time to clean up its act. As far as I'm concerned, its time has run out. Star Wars Fanboy, Inc. uses people and destroys lives without compunction. Do I blame society for this? No, I blame Star Wars Fanboy, Inc.. I have a dream that my children will be able to live in a world filled with open spaces and beautiful wilderness -- not in a dark, blinkered world run by the most crafty extortionists I've ever seen.

Here, too, we can see how Star Wars Fanboy, Inc. will stop at nothing to convert houses of worhip into houses of racialism. This may sound outrageous, but if it were fiction I would have thought of something more credible. As it stands, Star Wars Fanboy, Inc. doesn't want us to eschew scummy vigilantism. It would rather we settle for the meatless bone of demagogism. If Star Wars Fanboy, Inc. honestly believes that some of my points are not valid, I would love to get some specific feedback from it. I must emphasize that Star Wars Fanboy, Inc. says it's going to confuse the catastrophic power of state fascism with the repression of an authoritarian government in our minds in the blink of an eye. Is it out of its mind? The answer is fairly obvious when you consider that its chums have been staggering around like punch-drunk fighters hit too many times -- stunned, confused, betrayed, and trying desperately to rationalize its rude cock-and-bull stories. It is unequivocally not a pretty sight. Let's be realistic: Star Wars Fanboy, Inc. thinks we want it to censor by caricature and preempt discussion by stereotype. Excuse me, but maybe its hatchet men assert that people are pawns to be used and manipulated. I say to them, "Prove it" -- not that they'll be able to, of course, but because it is not my goal to stigmatize any and all attempts to do something about the continuing -- make that the escalating -- effort on Star Wars Fanboy, Inc.'s part to rifle, pillage, plunder, and loot, but the opposite. That conclusion is not based on some sort of mad, short-sighted philosophy or on Star Wars Fanboy, Inc.-style mental masturbation, but on widely known and proven principles of science. These principles explain that Star Wars Fanboy, Inc. likes thinking thoughts that aren't burdensome and that feel good. That's why there's an important difference between me and Star Wars Fanboy, Inc.. Namely, I am willing to die for my cause. Star Wars Fanboy, Inc., in contrast, is willing to kill for its -- or, if not to kill, at least to pander to the worst classes of dangerous creeps there are. Still, the issue of what to do about Star Wars Fanboy, Inc.'s passive-aggressive, catty anecdotes is far from settled. The letter you just read should be seen as a starting point for dialogue on this controversial issue.

*prances*

[The Cheshire Cat]

[img]rolleyes.gif[/img]

Board's broke!

[Peter Peeker]

or maybe, just maybe, you are using your cursed Jedi powers to defeat my tyrannical rule!

[The Cheshire Cat]

Yeah, let's go with that....

[img]wink.gif[/img]

[Oce]

too long...can't read it all

[RipperBendix]

I have an immensely large penis,
thank you for the attention.

[The Mighty Wolf]

I would like to issue a complaint that this thread has 5450 words and there no pictures of any pretty girls!

[img]wink.gif[/img]

(And yes I counted with word!)

[The Mighty Wolf]

And this thread is not toy related, my second complaint!

[img]wink.gif[/img]

[Darkest Angel]

I do not apologize for the amount of space in this letter I intend to devote to telling you about weak, pathetic mortals. Let's review the errors in weak, pathetic mortals' statements in order. First, weak, pathetic mortals' deeds are simply the result of vested interests striking back at a group whose actions in support of religious freedom, social reform, and government accountability have cut through those vested interests. The main dissensus between me and weak, pathetic mortals is that I contend that it is no exaggeration to say that each of us should realize after a moment's thought that the consequences of weak, pathetic mortals' stentorian smear tactics, particularly from a moral point of view, are not favorable. It, on the other hand, contends that laws are meant to be broken.

You know what we'd have if everybody wanted to conjure up dirt against its fellow human beings? Total chaos. If it is not yet clear that weak, pathetic mortals' buddies are nothing more than licentious, antisocial polemics, then consider that its plaints are part of a larger attack on the very notion of meritocracy and quality. In view of that, it is not surprising that it complains a lot. What's ironic, though, is that it hasn't made even a single concrete suggestion for improvement or identified a single problem with the system as it exists today. Weak, pathetic mortals' actions rub me the wrong way. To top that off, if weak, pathetic mortals want to complain, they should have an argument. They shouldn't just throw out the word "photodisintegration", for example, and expect us to be scared.

I feel that it can be safely said that weak, pathetic mortals often recruits venal cretins who bring to weak, pathetic mortals's cause new energy and a willingness to inspire a recrudescence of indecent fatuity. If there is one truth in this world, it's that weak, pathetic mortals are inherently inane, quasi-recalcitrant, and muddleheaded. Oh, and it also has a possession-obsessed mode of existence. Even though supposedly distancing themselves from drugged-out doomsday prophets, weak, pathetic mortals has really not changed its spots at all. We should not concern ourselves with weak, pathetic mortals' putative virtue or vice. Rather, we should concern ourselves with our own welfare and the fact that if I may be so bold, if there's an untold story here, it's that when I say that I am burning to know what classes of illogical, twisted reasons exist in the heads of those who create catchy, new terms for boring, old issues, this does not, I repeat, does not mean that freedom must be abolished in order for people to be more secure and comfortable. This is a common fallacy held by nefarious turncoats. I recently heard weak, pathetic mortals tell a bunch of people that the average working-class person can't see through its chicanery. I can't adequately describe my first reaction to this notion; I simply don't know how to represent uncontrollable laughter in text. Our goal must now be to punish those who lie or connive at half-truths. If you believe that that's a worthwhile goal, then I can honestly use your help. Let me hear from you.

{I swear to the gods it came up with this by itself. Seems like they actually know my style and POV...eeeeeeerie!)

[Slytherin Snape]

Ah, this will make for some fun messing with people. [img]biggrin.gif[/img]